Hamata v chairperson
WebSep 8, 2024 · In the recent judgment in Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee (supra; hereinafter “Hamata”) handed down by the … WebMAX HAMATA First Appellant FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION INSTITUTE Second Appellant and CHAIRPERSON, PENINSULA TECHNIKON INTERNAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE First Respondent CHAIRPERSON, PENINSULA TECHNIKON COUNCIL …
Hamata v chairperson
Did you know?
WebHamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee 2002 5 SA 449 (SCA) Lunt v University of Cape Town 1989 2 SA 438 (C) Maritzburg College v Dlamini 2005 JOL 15075 (N) Mkhize v Rector, University Of Zululand 1986 1 SA 901 (D) WebThe case of Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee, handed down by the Supreme Court of Appeal, is one of the first in a line of cases that establishes the law on legal representation in disciplinary inquiries. The case clearly establishes that there is no absolute right to
WebNov 2, 2024 · Hamata and Another v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee and Others 2002 (5) SA 449 (SCA). [4] Grogan (Dismissal Third Edition, 2024) Web2 See Hamata and Another v Chairperson of the Disciplinary Penensula Technicon Internal Disciplinary Hearing 2002 (5) SA 44 (SCA. 3 (2009) 30 ILJ 269 (LAC). 4 The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal not on the merit but due to unreasonable delay and failure by the appellant to appear when the matter was heard by the LAC.
WebMAX HAMATA and FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION INSTITUTE v CHAIRPERSON, PENINSULA TECHNIKON INTERNAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE and OTHERS, … Webrepresentation by staff and students of that university only. See Hamata v Chairperson Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee 2002 5 SA 449 (SCA) para 11, where Marais JA went as far as even as to state that "there is no constitutional imperative regarding legal representation
WebAdriaan van der Walt's 23 research works with 20 citations and 103 reads, including: THE RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION WHEN APPEARING BEFORE A DISCIPLINARY ENQUIRY Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula ...
WebIn the recent case, Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Minister of Labour, the High Court struck down the rule of the CCMA which restricted legal representation at CCMA arbitration as unconstitutional on grounds of irrationality. ... Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee 2002 5 SA 445 (SCA) Lace v Diack ... cybertruck ornamenthttp://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/pelj/v14n2/v14n2a06.pdf cheap tickets from accra to new yorkWebTHE RIGHT TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION WHEN APPEARING BEFORE A DISCIPLINARY ENQUIRY Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal … cheap tickets from atlanta to chennaihttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2002/44.html cheap tickets from ahmedabad to torontoWebHatata (/ h ɑː ˈ t ɑː t ə /; Ge'ez: ሐተታ ḥätäta "inquiry") is a Ge'ez term describing an investigation. The hatatas are two 17th century ethical and rational philosophical … cybertruck orders by stateWebalready been called. The chairperson has ruled on legal representation (on 25 July) and on the application for his recusal (on 23 August). It would be premature for this court to … cybertruck no airbagsWebJun 1, 2004 · 79 Die feite soos uitee ngesit in die uitspraak a quo (Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technik on Internal Disciplinary Co mmittee 2000 4 SA 621 (K) 626-629 par 1-18) en op appèl ( supra 454-455 ... cheap tickets from birmingham